dymovskiy.name

Major of Russia's State Border Protection Petr Ilyushkin, "Dymovsky is right!"

That is why I appeal to Russia Procurator General and the Chief Bailiff of Russia, and mainly to the public.

I am Lieutenant Colonel of Federal Security Service Ilyushkin Peter Nicolaevich, and I appeal to you for restoration of violated rights of me and my family. I worked for 30 years; my post was cut down several years ago; my contract has expired and my age-limit is over.

Almost three years ago a Military Court bound the Director of Federal Security Service director* (specific official) to provide housing for me and my family after getting my discharge from service. But the debtor – the director of Federal Security Service evades the execution of the decision of the court for 3 years.

My rights and the rights of my family (including disabled child) are not restored, but even more compounded.

Repeated appeals to Russia Procurator General and Chief court marshal, as well as to President of RF, Prime-Minister, Human rights commissioner, deputies concerning initiation of a criminal case according to the 315 clause of the Criminal Code of Russia finished with formal replies that informed that the Director of Federal Security Service does not have any housing.

While defending our rights we (with the disabled child in a wheelchair) repeatedly hold pickets on Lubyanska in Moscow (as reported by Ren-TV and “Novaya”, “Sobesednik”, “Pravda” newspapers). The debtor - the director of Federal Security Service ignores our appeals, as well as pickets and mass media.

After all instances in Russia which turned out to be helpless to make the debtor to execute the court decision I complained to the European Court of Human Rights.

Previously there had been considered the complaint of Colonel of Federal Security Service Sladkov. Strasbourg Court stated that Russia must provide the housing, regarding that housing shortages can not be an excuse for the Government not to obey the Court decision.

But they do have apartments! What happens behind the curtains is pretty simple: some Generals move out to a different housing without the proper returning the former apartment back. Just in the City of Stavropol I can count about 30 apartments that being kept by public prosecutors who actually do not reside there.

And they are present public prosecutors.

I believe this is how it works out in Moscow as well. Those Generals who come to serve there get their housing right away. In cases of simple military servants the story is totally different, they made to stay out of state for years, without proper housing and actual work to do.

And if they dare to complain or anything of that kind, they will have to face law suit and the court. It is a nonsense, but the public prosecutors completely ignore commanding officers’ violations whose reluctance to provide the housing generated this absurd situation.

The commanding officers must have taken lead from their chief – the director of Federal Security Service who personally evades the execution of the decision of the court.

Sladkov’s case proves that public officers keep their positions even having an evident criminal case in the past (unsatisfied judgment). And what do we have? Again and again Russia dishonors itself in Strasbourg Court while public prosecutors and bailiffs are afraid of Federal Security Service. I insist on making the debtor - the director of Federal Security Service to enforce the court's decision.

Digg It! » | We need your help »